An essential ingredient of nature connection is learning to
see animals, plants, and other life forms as subjects rather than objects. Young
kids do this instinctively. Yet, unfortunately, most of us “grow out of it”
during our middle childhood years. One of the best ways I know to maintain and
foster this kind of attitude is the “soap bubble technique,” invented by German
biologist Jakob von Uexküll. Head outside and picture every creature surrounded
by a soap bubble that represents its own individual sensory world. Now imagine
being able to step inside the bubble of your choice—say, of a robin, earthworm,
or butterfly. No matter what your selection, your world becomes transformed. Because
all creatures have highly specialized senses, the experience of colors, smells,
tastes, and sounds is very different in your chosen bubble world, as are your
motivations. Encourage kids to find their favorite animal, enter the imaginary
bubble, and experience this alternate world. To spur thoughts in the right
direction, you might ask, “Why do you think that creature is acting that way?” Of
course, the soap bubble technique is aided by some knowledge of the sensory
world of the creature in question, but such understanding isn’t necessary. It’s
the imagination that counts most. Best of all, by adding on new layers of
knowledge, this approach can be used effectively with preschoolers all the way
up to “university graduate schoolers,” offering an amazing outdoor educational
tool.
Monday, July 1, 2013
Sunday, June 30, 2013
NATURE TIP #1: Engage the Senses
Whenever possible, head outside and explore the multisensory
world of nature in all its glory. Too often these days, we are overly dependent
on our eyes and, as a result, closed to luscious scents, birdsong, or the
feeling of dirt between our toes. An emotional connection with nature is built
on a foundation of firsthand experience that taps into the full sensory range.
For kids, consider setting up a short outdoor rope course and invite them to
navigate it barefoot and blindfolded, perhaps identifying landmarks along the
way. Or ask them to close their eyes and name every sound they can hear at
different points along a forest stroll. Nighttime walks, preferably in a
natural place like a park, forest, or beach, are another magnificent way to
engage neglected senses. For a bounty of other sensory-expanding ideas, check
out books like Joseph Cornell’s “Sharing Nature With Children” (Dawn, 1998), or
Jennifer Ward’s “I Love Dirt! (Trumpeter, 2008).
Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Denver-Bound
As a few of you
have heard, next month I will be moving my life from the San Francisco Bay area
to Denver, Colorado to take on the role of vice president of research and
collections at the Denver Museum of Nature and Science. I am thrilled to be
joining the DMNS, one of the top-ranked natural history museums in the country.
At this pivotal moment in human history, museums of natural history have great
potential to help heal the divide that separates humans from nature, and the DMNS
is poised to take a leading role.
I have been serving on the DMNS board of trustees for a couple of years
now, and thus have had a chance to get to know this remarkable institution and its
leadership. The Museum has already committed itself to moving beyond the 19th
Century “cabinets of curiosities” approach. Rather than being simply a
destination where people go to see old stuff and absorb information, the
revolutionary new way of thinking entails two-way interactions with the
community, and a much higher degree of relevance.
When my good friend Kirk Johnson departed the VP role at the DMNS to take
on the directorship of the Smithonsian Natural History Museum, he suggested
that a move to Denver might be just the ticket, allowing me to pursue my
passion of connecting people with nature. I came to agree wholeheartedly, and
am honored that the Museum has chosen to bring me into their fold. Fortunately, along with heading up the research division, joining a talented leadership team, and working with the
local community, I’ll have the opportunity to keep doing some dinosaur research
and media work like Dinosaur Train.
So all in all, it’s a dream job for a kid who never quite grew up!
I hope to see you all in Denver as the DMNS embraces novel, exciting, and
revolutionary ways to explore and reconnect people with the natural world!
(Note that the DMNS logo is a whirlpool of sorts. Coincidence?)
(Note that the DMNS logo is a whirlpool of sorts. Coincidence?)
Top image Credit: dbetoday.com
Tuesday, January 22, 2013
The Human-Nature Divide
Every year, NY literary agent John Brockman asks a group of folks to answer the "Edge Annual Question." This year's query is, "What should we be worried about." Below is my answer, a blend of some recent blog posts plus a new idea or two. Hope you enjoy. And feel free to check out this answer and the many other responses on Brockman's Edge website.
We should all be worried about the gaping psychological
chasm separating humanity from nature. Indeed a strong argument can be made
that bridging this divide deserves to be ranked amongst the most urgent 21st
Century priorities. Yet so far the human-nature divide hasn’t even made it to our
cultural to-do list.
For the past several decades, numerous scientists and
environmentalists have been telling us that we must change our ways and strike
a balance with nature, or face catastrophic consequences. I myself have often
participated in this echo chamber, doling out dire statistics in hopes of
engaging people in action. The unspoken assumption has been that cold, hard
facts are all that’s needed for people (including business people and elected
officials) to “get it” and alter their unsustainable ways. To date, however,
virtually all the key indicators—from greenhouse gas emissions to habitat and
species losses—are still heading in the wrong direction. The blade of the “hockey
stick” continues to lengthen.
The problem is, humans aren’t rational creatures. At least,
not when it comes to shifting their behaviors. As marketing executives have
long understood, humans are far more susceptible to emotional messages,
especially when conveyed through imagery. Want to escalate sales of some new
car model? Beautiful people driving through pristine natural settings are far
more powerful motivators than statistics on horsepower and fuel efficiency.
But what emotion is needed to foster a sustainable shift in
human behavior? In a word, love.
As the late evolutionary biologist Stephen J. Gould once
claimed in an uncharacteristic moment of sentimentality, “We cannot win this
battle to save species and environments without forging an emotional bond
between ourselves and nature—for we will not fight to save what we do not
love.” The good news is that, thanks to a lengthy evolutionary tenure living in
intimate contact with the nonhuman world, the capacity to form an emotional attachment with nature probably lays
dormant within all of us, waiting to be reawakened (think E. O. Wilson’s
“biophilia”).
The bad news is
that, as a species, we’ve never been more disconnected from the natural world. Thanks
to a variety of factors—among them fear of strangers and an obsession with
screens—children’s firsthand encounters with nature in the developed world have
dropped precipitously to less than 10% of what they were just one generation
ago. The average American youth now spends seven to ten hours per day staring
at screens compared to a mere handful of minutes in any “natural” setting. The
result of this indoor migration is a runaway health crisis, both for children
(obesity, ADHD, stress, etc.) and the places they live.
Science has been one of the primary forces driving a wedge
between humans and nature, prompting us to see nature as objects rather than subjects,
resources to be exploited rather than relatives to be respected. Yet science,
particularly over the past few decades, has also empirically demonstrated our
complete embeddedness within nature, from the trillions of bacterial cells that
far outnumber human cells in our bodies to our role as newbie actors in the 14
billion-year evolutionary epic.
Do we need more science? Of course, and the general public
must learn the necessary facts, dire and difficult though they may be. We’re
also going to need all the technological help we can get to help us navigate a
sustainable path into the future. Yet knowledge and technology without
emotional connection simply won’t cut it. The next generation of humans must
learn to see their relationship with the natural world in ways that will seem
alien to our current anthropocentric, reductionist, and materialistic
perspective.
Thursday, January 3, 2013
Nature Tips
We humans have a
rather bizarre relationship with nature. We seek out nature to stroll, run,
bike, rollerblade, climb, swim, skydive, surf, sail, commune, birdwatch,
whalewatch, and stargaze, spending billions of dollars a year gearing up for
and traveling to these activities. While there, we might collect bugs, rocks,
driftwood, fossils, counts of bird species, or, most commonly these days,
photographs. Closer to home, we grow nature in our gardens, place it in pots
that adorn our living spaces, cherish it as pets, and hug stuffed
manifestations of it to our sleeping bodies. Increasingly, we also consume
digital versions—books, documentaries, movies, and videos—that allow us to
travel to wild places without so much as stepping beyond the front door.
On the flip side,
we also kill nature for sport and place it in cages for our amusement. We rip
it from mountainsides, scrape it off the ocean’s bottom, harvest it for raw
materials, befoul it with various toxins, and destroy it in vast quantities to
accommodate humanity’s sprawl. Most fundamental of all, we chew up and swallow
substantial amounts of nature daily simply to fuel our bodily selves.
How can we possibly
eat nature and love it too (beyond the taste, that is)? More to the point, how
exactly do we go about connecting with this thing called nature?
The heart of the
answer, I’ve come to think, is embodied in a simple question. Do you think of
yourself as inside or outside of nature?
Our present
dominant worldview places humanity outside and above nature, reducing it to
mere resources. This “denaturing” has been ongoing for thousands of years, driven
by such forces as agriculture, science, and technology. If we’re going to
develop a true compassion for nature—a matter of urgent importance for this
century—we must understand that the human-nature divide is a delusion. Cutting
edge science now demonstrates that we are fully embedded within nature, and
also that nature is embedded within us. All life forms on Earth, it turns out,
are our kin.
The human-nature
disconnect is a cross-cultural phenomenon, blind to skin color and household
income. It applies to urban, suburban, and rural families. Today millions of
people are aware that we must reinsert nature into our lives, and especially
those of our children. But, in this time of increasing urbanization, helicopter
parenting, and digital obsession, parents and educators don’t know how to begin
the process, let alone foster a lasting nature connection in children. A
critical first step, then, is to map out the signposts common to this journey
wherever it is undertaken.
Several years ago,
I came to the realization that re-establishing a strong emotional attachment
with nature was critical for the health of our children and the places they
live. Given all the organizations that profess to be connecting people with
nature—among them natural history museums, botanical gardens, zoos,
planetariums, aquariums, science centers, nature centers, and schools—I assumed
that the process of nature connection must be well documented. What I found when
I went out to search for answers, however, was an abundance of disparate
articles and research papers, but no general audience summaries. So I’m now in
the midst of writing a book on nature connection intended for parents,
teachers, and anyone else seeking to connect themselves and others with nature.
Yet, rather than
waiting for the book’s publication to reveal the process of nature connection,
I’ve decided to launch a Facebook site that will, among other things, serve as
the home of weekly “Nature Tips”
during 2013. These tips, typically posted on Thursdays (just prior to the weekend), will provide direct
advice for connecting kids and adults with nature. My sincere hope is that you
will find them useful in your own nature-bonding efforts. Of course, please feel
free to share them with anyone else that you think might benefit.
Ultimately, nature
connection comes down to developing new habits of interacting with the
other-than-human world, habits of body and mind that encourage us to experience
natural wonders firsthand.
So I cordially
invite you to check out the inaugural Nature Tip, all about engaging the
senses, on my new Facebook page: http://www.facebook.com/DrScottSampson.
And, of course, feel free to share with others who might be interested!
I sincerely hope
that you enjoy Nature Tips. And may 2013 be a banner year of nature connection for
you and others in your life!
Scott Sampson
Monday, December 31, 2012
Learning Bird Language
Arriving at our backyard “sit spot,” Jade and I didn’t have
to wait long before the familiar chickadee duo appeared in a nearby thicket and
began chirping happily. A male robin patrolling his territory wasn’t far behind,
his pulsing crimson breast pumping out a gorgeous melody. Next to emerge,
seemingly out of thin air, was a pair of song sparrows, who began a staccato of
“seep-seep” calls. “I’m here.” “Yes, I’m here too.”
Suddenly, like a lighting strike, the calm morning was
upended. The chickadees flew to a higher branch. All the birds switched to
high-pitched alarm calls, echoed by other birds previously unseen. A host of
avian eyes peered downward, searching. Somewhere in the underbrush, a predator
had arrived . . .
Three years ago, I began work on a book about connecting
people with nature. I must confess that, at the beginning, I felt a certain sense
of self-satisfaction, convinced that a lifetime of outdoor play, hiking, and
camping—including, cumulatively, years spent living in tents in remote places while
digging dinosaur fossils—had forged within me a deep bond with nature. But researching this book destroyed that
perception. Instead, I found that, like most of us, I was quite oblivious to
the natural goings-on around me. Indeed I often impacted these events in
negative ways.
My insights came in
part from reading about “bird
language,” the acquired skill of understanding the meaning of local animals’
calls and movements. Championed by expert naturalist, tracker, and mentor Jon
Young, bird language offers a powerful tool to heighten our awareness of, and
connection with, nature [1-3]. Throughout almost all of human history, people
were fluent in the local dialect of bird language because it was a matter of
life and death. A bird’s call might lead you to your next meal, or prevent you
from becoming some other animal’s meal.
Earlier this year, I decided it was time for me to learn bird language,
and my ten year-old daughter Jade decided to join in on the fun. Our guide for
the journey was Jon Young’s excellent 2012 book, What the Robin Knows [1]. By the end of the first month of regular
visits to our backyard sit-spot, Jade and I were beginning to see the
neighborhood differently. For one thing, those nameless little feathered
creatures chirping in the trees were transforming into distinct species, each
with a unique voice and character. Our journals soon included such entries as,
“Pair of chickadees singing in thicket to west,” and “Four European starlings
sitting in Monterey Pine to the south.” Through diligent awareness (aided by a
pair of binoculars and a birding app on my iPhone), we were beginning to see
and hear more.
Although birds are nearly ubiquitous outdoors, rarely do we
stop and consider what they’re doing, or why they’re doing it in that spot and
not another. Because we’ve forgotten what it’s like to hunt or be hunted, our
implicit assumption is that birds are a lot like us, moving about almost
randomly. But for most animals, predator and prey, random behavior offers a
fast track to premature death. If you’re a North American songbird, predators
come in various shapes and sizes, and threaten from multiple directions. Foxes
and cats prowl the ground. Raccoons and ravens raid nests in trees. Hawks and
owls attack from the air. Most feared of all, it seems, are accipters like the
Cooper’s hawk, a common but rarely seen assassin befitting the title, “Death
from Above.” Cooper’s hawks are experts at killing birds on the wing, diving
fearlessly into trees and thickets.
No surprise then that most birds have small territories that
they know intimately, and tend to follow the same paths through these spaces.
Along with understanding local geography, those robins, wrens, and ravens are
fluent in bird language. Always vigilant, they listen continually for alarm
calls, and not just from their own kind. A robin will react to the alarm of a
song sparrow and vice versa. For the same reason, squirrels and rabbits know
bird language too. The end result is a vast web of awareness that generates a
local, ever-shifting “mood.” If the mood is relaxed, “baseline” behaviors such
as feeding and song dominate. If things turn tense, alarms will sound, silence
may ensue, and animals often flee. Although we tend to ignore our neighborhood
avians, it turns out that the birds know us, and our pets. Why? Because it’s a
matter of life and death. Local birds even react in predictable ways to our
behaviors. We simply fail to notice.
But Jade and I are starting to take note. We’ve learned that
the way we walk to our sit spot—slow and relaxed instead of hurried—can greatly
reduce the time it takes for the birds to resume their baseline behavior. The
biggest challenge in becoming adept at bird language, we found, is getting to
know this baseline for a variety of local birds. Each species uses several
different vocalizations, from melodious songs and subtle companion calls to
boisterous territorial squawking and, in the case of hungry babies, impatient
screams. Only by gaining firsthand understanding of this background behavior can
one begin to detect disturbances that might indicate a predator’s presence.
Yet, even with just a few weeks practice under our belts,
Jade and I found our awareness expanding, and with it our sense of appreciation
and even empathy. When familiar birds are absent during our sit-spot sessions,
we wonder what they’re up to. And we find ourselves slowing down more often as
we enter and exited the house, listening for signs of the neighborhood “mood.”
Wildness just outside the front door is helping us deepen our bond with nature.
These interactions, I have come to realize, are essential to nature connection.
If we are going to foster in our children (and ourselves) that all-important
sense of internal wildness, we must first have abundant experience of external
wildness.
Jade and I are looking forward to becoming more fluent in
bird language in the coming year, and using these new skills to identify and
actually catch sight of local predators.
What will you do in 2013 to connect yourself and others with
nature?
Notes and References
1. Young, Jon. 2012. What the Robin Knows: How Birds Reveal the Secrets of the Natural World.
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New York.
2. Young, J., E. Haas, and E. McGown. Coyote’s Guide To Connecting With Nature,
Second Edition. OWLink Media,
Shelton, WA.
3. Website: http://birdlanguage.com/
Image Credits (top to bottom)
1) Coffee Creek Watershed Preserve
2) Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
3) www.ronrink.com
Thursday, November 29, 2012
Falling in Love With Nature
Yesterday,
I discovered a remarkable TED talk by David Roberts. Roberts is a blogger who
writes about energy and politics for Grist. His aim in this 15-minute
presentation, remixed with music and extra imagery, is to summarize and simplify the science
of climate change. Just the facts ma’am. Now, I study fossils, not climate, so
I’m not on a first-name basis with all the relevant data. Yet, given my understanding
of current climatological consensus, Roberts has his facts straight.
His core message
is, to put it bluntly, terrifying. On our present trajectory (“business as
usual”), the forecast for the end of this century is at least a 4-degree
Celsius increase in global temperature, generating rampant coastal flooding, inland
desertification, and human suffering on a vast, unfathomable scale. A couple of
centuries after that, we may be facing a scorched Earth, unlivable for humans in
many regions.
For me,
the exactness of such projected increases in global temperatures, habitat loss,
and species extinctions is not the issue. If you accept the scientific method
as valid, and respect the strong consensus of the world’s top scientists, we’re on the
fast-track to Hades, with less than a generation to make a major course
correction.
This, of
course, is not exactly breaking news. For the past few decades, scientists and
environmentalists have been telling whoever would listen that we must change
our ways and strike a balance with nature, or face catastrophic consequences. I
myself have often participated in this echo chamber, doling out dire statistics
in hopes of engaging people in action. The unspoken assumption has been that
cold, hard facts, the kind the Roberts offers us, are all that’s needed for
people to “get it” and alter their unsustainable ways.
The
problem is, humans aren’t rational creatures. At least, not when it comes to
shifting their behavior. If you doubt this claim, look at the tactics used by the
true experts in behavior modification.
Marketing
executives have long understood that humans respond to emotional messages,
especially through imagery. Want to persuade a lot of people to buy a new car? Beautiful,
scantily clad bodies in pristine natural settings are far more powerful
motivators than horsepower or fuel efficiency statistics. So what’s the emotion
we need to foster if we’re to shift human behaviors in the direction of
sustainability? In a word, love.
As the
late evolutionary biologist Stephen J. Gould once claimed [1], “We cannot win
this battle to save species and environments without forging an emotional bond
between ourselves and nature—for we will not fight to save what we do not
love.” The good news is that, thanks to a lengthy evolutionary tenure living in
intimate contact with the nonhuman world, the capacity to fall in love with nature lays dormant within all of us,
waiting to be reawakened [2]. Embracing this emotional need, the
International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) recently launched a
“Love, Not Loss” campaign [3], arguing that we must replace the standard
doom-and-gloom message with one of love. (Check out their powerful video here.)
Our goal, they say, must be to help humanity to once again fall in love with
nature. I could not agree more.
And the
best time to initiate this love affair? Childhood.
Today,
few kids escape the frightening barrage of bad eco-news, frequently learning
about our rampant environmental destruction early in elementary school. And the
stunning images they see—polar bears standing on shrinking chunks of ice;
Amazon rainforest leveled under a mechanized onslaught—too often generate fear
rather than love, numbness rather than action. Here I concur with David Sobel
[4], who argues that, when it comes to education, there should be no disasters
before fourth grade.
So how do
we turn things around and help people fall in love with nature? Well, a growing
mountain of evidence suggests that the best place to start is wherever you happen
to be—that is, your local place. Plenty of firsthand, multisensory experience, together with a healthy dose of wonder, are essential ingredients, especially for children. Learning about
the history and workings of your local environs are also critical.
In
contrast with traditional approaches, place-based learning is all about
hands-on, inquiry-driven, often outdoor activities [4, 5]. Going beyond
traditional disciplinary boundaries like math and social studies, emphasis is placed
on integrative projects that transform communities into classrooms.
Far from
being parochial, learning in place simply begins in local landscapes and migrates
outward. Better to understand that nearby oak or fir forest before trying to
comprehend (let alone care about) the Amazon rainforest. Many are surprised to
learn that a place-based approach to learning fosters not only a stronger
connection with local nature, but heightened academic performance across the
board. And it isn’t just for schoolteachers. To fully take root, parents,
caregivers, and informal educators must embrace this revolutionary approach.
In short,
falling in love with nature begins at home, preferably as children, in our
local communities, inspired by wonder. A strong sense of
place rooted in emotional connection reveals the beauty of the natural world,
the truth of our embeddedness within nature, and the goodness inherent in
caring for one’s home ground. It provides the foundation for Aldo
Leopold’s land ethic: “A thing is right
when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the biotic
community. It is wrong when it tends otherwise.”
Don’t
misunderstand me. If we are to navigate a sustainable path out of our current
predicament, we have to be honest with ourselves and learn the facts, difficult
though they may be. And we are going to need all the technological help we can get along the way. Yet knowledge and technology without emotional connection are simply not
going to be enough. That’s why helping children fall in love with nature deserves
to be an urgent international priority, on par with reducing greenhouse gas
emissions and preserving species and wild places.
References
1. Gould, S. J. 1993. Unenchanted
evening. Eight Little Piggies:
Reflections in Natural History. Norton, New York. Quotation from p. 40.
2. Sampson, S. D. 2012. The
topophilia hypothesis: Ecopsychology meets evolutionary psychology. Pp. 23-53
in P. H. Kahn and P. H. Hasbach (eds.), Ecopsychology:
Science Totems, and the Technological Species. MIT Press, Boston.
4. Sobel, D. 2004. Place-Based Education: Connecting Classrooms
& Communities. Orion Society, Barrington, MA.
5. Sobel, D. 2008. Childhood and Nature: Design Principles for
Educators. Stenhouse, Portland, Maine.
Image Sources (from top to bottom)
1. http://junkscience.com/2012/06/14/sun-runs-obligatory-northern-summer-stranded-poley-pictorial/
2. http://nowastewednesdays.com/2011/04/27/
3. http://www.thenaturalcapital.com/2009/10/getting-kids-into-nature-great-websites.html
4. http://studio3music.com/things-to-do/less-tv-what’s-a-parent-to-do/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

_(7276182366).jpg)











